A good review includes enough detail to give others an idea of what happened. Explain what factors contributed to your positive, negative, or simply regular experience. You can also offer feedback on what the company is doing well and how it can improve. Needless to say, the review should be shorter than the article being reviewed.
An acceptable review ranges from one to four pages, the first is considered short and the last one long. With this in mind, these are the limits for your own review. Try not to write under a page, as that would be very little information. Your opinion should include an introduction, summary of the article, criticism, conclusion and references.
Even for a very short article, the review must be at least one page long. Anything below can mean very few arguments in the area of criticism or not have enough good references on which to base your opinion. On the other hand, you can also write too much. Under no circumstances should you write a review that is longer than the article.
Even writing more than four pages can be too much because readers could get lost in too much information. However, if you end up writing a review longer than four pages, make sure that it is based on good arguments, that it is not wordy, and that it has an objective focus. Use headings to properly structure information, so that the reader can easily follow your ideas. Don't write a review based on a negative complaint.
Structuring literature review by methodology can be useful if you are drawing research from a variety of disciplines and are criticizing different methodologies. Here are some questions you can ask yourself to help you structure your literature review chronologically. In a way, chronology plays a role, whatever way you decide to structure your literature review, because you will always, to a certain extent, analyze how literature has developed. Equally important, you need to have a structure in place before you start writing, or your literature review will likely end up being a disjointed and disjointed disaster.
Now, if you're thinking that there's a one-size-fits-all review structure, you're in for a disappointment. Like any other chapter of your thesis or dissertation, the literature review should have a clear and logical structure. The methodological option is a way of structuring the literature review by the research methodologies used. If the structure of your literature review chapter goes wrong, you will struggle to achieve these goals.
The decision on the structure of the literature review should come towards the end of the literature review process, after having collected and digested the literature, but before starting to write the chapter. Therefore, when thinking about structuring your literature review, you should think about which structural approach will provide the best “review” for your specific type of research and objectives (we'll talk about this shortly). Organizing literature chronologically is one of the simplest ways to structure literature review. Structuring the literature review thematically would mean structuring the body section of the literature review to discuss each of these topics, one section at a time.
The thematic approach to structuring a literature review means organizing literature by topic or category, for example, by independent variables (i.
